We first check whether your company or person meets notability rules. If it does, we prepare a draft article and a Wikidata item built on independent sources. Wikipedia restricts paid editing, so everything is done openly.
Quote and schedule after your brief
We run a notability audit before any writing. We look for independent sources and compare them with the guidelines. If the chance is low, we say so and suggest how to build coverage first.
That happens when payment is hidden. We disclose paid editing on the user page, write neutrally, and submit drafts for review instead of publishing around the process.
We file edit requests on the article's talk page with reliable sources attached. We don't rewrite the article ourselves. Volunteer editors make the final call.
We create a Wikidata item with statements (name, website, founding date, country, identifiers) and references. Search engines and other services reuse this structured data.
Use a package to describe what you need. We agree on the quote and schedule after reviewing your brief and requirements.
For those who want to know if an article is worth pursuing
For a brand or person that needs a structured record
For companies and people who passed the notability audit
We collect facts about your brand or person and look for independent sources. You get a clear verdict: grounds exist or they don't.
We list the publications the text will rest on. Press releases and your own site are not used as the basis.
We set up a user page disclosing the payment and write a neutral draft with no promotional language.
We submit the draft and respond to reviewer comments. Review can take weeks, and we can't speed it up.
You receive the materials, the source list and a guide to monitoring changes. Everything created on your behalf stays accessible to you.
Yes, but only with disclosure. The Wikimedia Terms of Use require you to state who pays and for what. We always disclose. Without it, accounts get blocked and text gets deleted.
It means independent, reliable sources have covered the subject in depth. Your own site, press releases and advertorials don't count. Without such sources, an article will most likely be deleted.
Wikipedia holds articles. Wikidata holds structured data: name, founding date, website, identifiers. Criteria are looser, but sources are still needed. An item does not replace an article.
We don't promise a direct effect. Search engines use Wikipedia and Wikidata as one source of entity information, but the impact varies. The main benefit is trust and accurate data.
Links to independent coverage of you, factual details, and approval of the text. You also need to accept that we add nothing the sources don't support.
Yes, through edit requests on the talk page with sources attached. Editors decide whether to apply them. Sometimes they decline, and we will tell you plainly.
Describe your business, the outcome you need and your current workflow. We will clarify the requirements and prepare a quote after your brief.